🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.