🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.